<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Back in a Bit &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://backinabit.com/tag/google/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://backinabit.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:15:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Wave: the long KISS goodnight</title>
		<link>http://backinabit.com/google-wave-long-kiss-goodnight</link>
		<comments>http://backinabit.com/google-wave-long-kiss-goodnight#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>momorgan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[None]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google-wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backinabit.com/?p=888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, when I read that Google Wave was going to change my business, career and life, I must admit I was moderately excited. I totally didn&#8217;t get the ins-and-outs of it, but that&#8217;s very often the way. In fact &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://backinabit.com/google-wave-long-kiss-goodnight/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BlackBerry and Gmail, sitting in a tree</title>
		<link>http://backinabit.com/blackberry-and-gmail-sitting-in-a-tree</link>
		<comments>http://backinabit.com/blackberry-and-gmail-sitting-in-a-tree#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>momorgan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[None]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile-email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile-phones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backinabit.com/2007/08/blackberry-and-gmail-sitting-in-a-tree/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this user&#8217;s experience, BlackBerry and Gmail seem to get on well. Really well, in fact. Maybe even a little too well. Can I smell some kind of alliance? I know we&#8217;re still supposed to be all excited about iPhone &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://backinabit.com/blackberry-and-gmail-sitting-in-a-tree/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Desktop privacy branded ‘unacceptable’</title>
		<link>http://backinabit.com/google-desktop-privacy-branded-unacceptable</link>
		<comments>http://backinabit.com/google-desktop-privacy-branded-unacceptable#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 06:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>momorgan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[None]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google-desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s1753.gridserver.com/2004/10/16/google-desktop-privacy-branded-unacceptable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uttered by Copernic, reported by The Register. Are toys leaving the pram, or does this accurately highlight the beginnings of something deeply ugly?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://backinabit.com/google-desktop-privacy-branded-unacceptable/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on Google Desktop Search</title>
		<link>http://backinabit.com/thoughts-on-google-desktop-search</link>
		<comments>http://backinabit.com/thoughts-on-google-desktop-search#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>momorgan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[None]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google-desktop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s1753.gridserver.com/2004/10/15/thoughts-on-google-desktop-search/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google finally put out their Desktop Search application yesterday, and it looks very useful. Anyone who’s ever used Microsoft’s method of indexing to search their own machine, and those of us who have been unfortunate enough to try and develop &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://backinabit.com/thoughts-on-google-desktop-search/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Definitions</title>
		<link>http://backinabit.com/google-definitions</link>
		<comments>http://backinabit.com/google-definitions#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>momorgan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[None]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s1753.gridserver.com/2003/11/12/google-definitions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google’s ability to define words is slightly more useful than at first it seems. This is an ideal thing for Google to be able to do. It’s a long way from being a new trick—if you’re familiar enough with the &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://backinabit.com/google-definitions/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improving on reverse-chronology</title>
		<link>http://backinabit.com/improving-on-reverse-chronology</link>
		<comments>http://backinabit.com/improving-on-reverse-chronology#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2003 15:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>momorgan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[None]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content-management-systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information-architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weblogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s1753.gridserver.com/2003/11/06/improving-on-reverse-chronology/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reverse-chronological arrangement of weblog posts has frustrated me for years. It’s a format that works for about the first week in the life of a weblog, and after that it becomes more and more of a headache. One of &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://backinabit.com/improving-on-reverse-chronology/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Busy doing nothing</title>
		<link>http://backinabit.com/busy-doing-nothing</link>
		<comments>http://backinabit.com/busy-doing-nothing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>momorgan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[None]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain-names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain-squatting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultimate-search-inc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s1753.gridserver.com/2002/09/21/busy-doing-nothing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s simply astounding how many domain names have been registered but do nothing. At the present time, Google knows of over five thousand of them pointing to a single ISP. Interestingly, Google also knows about over five thousand domains now &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://backinabit.com/busy-doing-nothing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

