<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do you know if your IT department is any good?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://backinabit.com/2007/01/how-do-you-know-if-your-it-department-is-any-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://backinabit.com/2007/01/how-do-you-know-if-your-it-department-is-any-good/</link>
	<description>A sporadic weblog from the United Kingdom about culture and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bojo &#187; How do you know if your IT department is any good?</title>
		<link>http://backinabit.com/2007/01/how-do-you-know-if-your-it-department-is-any-good/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>bojo &#187; How do you know if your IT department is any good?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backinabit.com/2007/01/how-do-you-know-if-your-it-department-is-any-good/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] A post from Mo the other day on how IT managers can earn the trust of directors speaks a lot of sense: If you pump enough resources into something, it will eventually appear to function, but was is the right way to solve the problem? Sure, your technical people answered your request for functionality, but have they simply gone fishing with dynamite? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A post from Mo the other day on how IT managers can earn the trust of directors speaks a lot of sense: If you pump enough resources into something, it will eventually appear to function, but was is the right way to solve the problem? Sure, your technical people answered your request for functionality, but have they simply gone fishing with dynamite? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
